Nowadays, it appears as if there may be an “app” for every part. However the fiasco final week with the Iowa Democratic Occasion’s presidential nominating caucuses is a reminder that the enchantment of latest know-how must be tempered by concern over reliability.
Iowa’s caucus course of is the primary contest amongst candidates in search of the very best workplace within the land. It is also an uncommon methodology of gauging voter assist. As an alternative of a traditional major election, Iowans use a town-hall assembly format, precinct by precinct.
Democrat leaders in that state determined this yr to make extra use of know-how in dealing with their occasion’s caucuses. Calling it a catastrophe is placing it mildly. Even every week after Iowa Democrats trekked to their precincts for caucuses, closing outcomes have been unsure. On Monday, Bernie Sanders’ and Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaigns filed requests for a partial recanvass of the outcomes of Iowa’s Democratic caucuses.
An enormous, pervasive breakdown of the brand new system made the method a humiliation.
Clearly, Iowa Democrat leaders ought to have examined the system higher and skilled precinct-level employees higher.
Although different states within the presidential nominating course of depend on typical major elections, the Iowa fiasco is a invaluable reminder that whereas know-how can enable us to do issues sooner and extra effectively, over-reliance on it may be dangerous.
All through the nation, considerate political occasion and authorities election officers should view the Iowa expertise as a warning: Being sure the a brand new “app” works as marketed is crucial.